nbn
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| nbn [2005/02/15 14:18] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1 | nbn [2005/02/15 14:36] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== NbN ====== | ||
| + | NbN is a strong pinning superconductor with a relatively high Tc. | ||
| + | ===== Sputtering ===== | ||
| + | NbN can be reactively sputtered by adding N< | ||
| + | * Links to papers about the hysteresis loop of reactive sputtering come here | ||
| + | * Links to papers about reactive NbN sputtering go here | ||
| + | * Links to papers about physical properties of NbN go here | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Z-400 ==== | ||
| + | In the Z-400 2 recipes are in use for sputtering NbN: Gertjan uses 1.7 kV and blend, Olaf uses 1.0 kV and no blend. See the [[Z-400]] page for details. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== UHV ==== | ||
| + | Details about sputtering NbN in the [[UHV system]] go here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Deposition rates ===== | ||
| + | There is a systematic difference in X-ray and RBS thickness. Fitted composition makes sense and scatter yield make sense, it seems that (nuclear) collision crosssection and (electronic) stopping exponent are calculated OK. RUMP uses the wrong density, so the following procedure should be used: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Fit the thickness t in /cm2 | ||
| + | - Area nuclear density | ||
| + | - Thickness = a/d where d = atomic density | ||
| + | |||
| + | The density of Nb is 8.57 g/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | atpercm2=471e15 # whatever RUMP fit gives | ||
| + | rho=8.52 | ||
| + | n_a=6.022e23 | ||
| + | m_nb=92.906 | ||
| + | m_n=14.007 | ||
| + | |||
| + | molmass(x)=x*m_nb+(1-x)*m_n | ||
| + | atpercm3(x)=n_a*rho/ | ||
| + | cm(x)=atpercm2/ | ||
| + | nm(x)=cm(x)*1e7 | ||
| + | |||
| + | set term postscript color | ||
| + | set xrange [0.45 to 1] | ||
| + | set title " | ||
| + | set xlabel " | ||
| + | set ylabel " | ||
| + | plot nm(x) | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The result is shown below: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{images: | ||
| + | |||
| + | So for the fitted composition Nb< | ||